摘要:现代的陪审制源于英国，后来被世界各国借鉴，逐渐演变为各国重要的诉讼制度。本文通过讲述陪审制的起源与发展，并通过美国和法国作为代表国家介绍了陪审制与参审制的异同，从而引出了中国的人民陪审员制度。通过分析中国的人民陪审员制度的现状，进一步指明人民陪审员制度的不足。陪审制对于一个国家的司法民主和公正极其重要，所以要继续存在使用。笔者建议对陪审员的资格、陪审制审理案件的范围、审理结果不受审委会干预等问题进行改革，完善有关法规，重构中国的人民陪审员制度。

关键词: 人民陪审员制度;民主和公正;完善措施;重构制度

Abstract:The modern jury system originated from England.Then countries draw lessons from it in the world. It has become an important lawsuit system. This paper describes the origin and development of the jury system. Through the United States and France as the representative countries introduced jury system and attending system similarities and differences to introduce Chinese people jury system. We through the analysis of Chinese jury system present situation to point out that the people's jury system deficiencies. The jury for a national judicial democracy and justice is extremely important, we will continue to use the jury system..The author puts forward a series of reform measures to restructure Chinese jury system.These measures are the qualifications of jurors,the scope of the jury system to hear cases,the outcome of the trial without interference and so on.

Key words: the people's jury system; democracy and justice; measures to improve;reconfigurable system

　　　我们可以看到，人民陪审员制度出现了诸多问题，其改革完善并不是一朝一夕就能实现的。作为支持人民陪审员制度在我国应该继续施行的一分子来说，要找出该项制度的问题所在，然后对症下药。保障司法的公正和司法的民主是司法体制改革的重要措施。能善用人民陪审员制度，对司法公正和民主具有极大的意义。因此，我们必须加快步伐进一步完善陪审制度，使其发挥出在诉讼上的应有职能，促进法治理念在中国的普及。